Tell me more ×
Graphic Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional graphic designers and non-designers trying to do their own graphic design. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm designing a template for product packaging. While designing, I'd like to have the layout as it would be printed out flat, but I'd also like to have different 'views' (front, back, bottom, etc) so that they can be easily show to other people.

I'd like to do this with a transform so that I won't accidentally have any differences between the layout and the views.

Here is what I'm trying to achieve: http://imgur.com/a/3Ponj#0

First I apply the transform effect to the "Original" (rotate, move horizontally and vertically) (image 2)

Then I add a compound clipping mask so that the "C" panel isn't shown in the view I just made (image 3)

So far so good. When I try to add another transform effect is where the problem arises (image 4)

As you can see, the second transform is including everything from the first transform. Is there a way around this? Or maybe a better way of doing what I'm trying to achieve? I am using AI CS5.5.

share|improve this question
Are you duplicating object physically or simply tying in a number of "copies" in the transform effect? – Scott Nov 21 '12 at 20:59
Copies, so that each time I edit the original the edits get changes on the views as well. – John Nov 21 '12 at 21:01
Then what you are trying to do is not possible. I'll post a better solution. – Scott Nov 21 '12 at 21:04

3 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The Transform Effect only allows for the replication of the effect on all copies. THere's no way to create copies via the Transform Effect and then alter each copy independently.

A better solution....

Set up the first item and then drag it to the Symbol Panel. This will turn the layout into a symbol. Copy the symbol on the artboard and rotate it, mask it, scale it, etc.

If you then need to edit the original, simply double-click the symbol in the Symbol Panel. All edits will be reflected in all copies.

share|improve this answer
I think that should work. Thanks – John Nov 21 '12 at 21:22

One way to do what you indicate in your link is to place the file as a linked file 2 (or 3) times in a second document, and apply clipping masks as needed. You edit the original document and then update the links in the second document. I haven't done this exact thing in Illustrator, so I am presuming the clipping mask will not need to be updated, but I am fairly certain that rotation, offset, and scaling settings will survive a link refresh of the same file.

AFAIK, Illustrator supports live links in this manner, as does InDesign (Photoshop does not).

I have used Illustrator to build up multiple versions of a logo with different components and wordings and even made contact sheets showing them all in a single sheet, all of it using linked files to simpler versions of components. The only thing I am not sure about is the clipping mask. I may have done it I just can't remember.

TLDNR; you set up a second document which is used for display purposes (not editing) and drop multiple links to the same file so they reflect the most recent edited version.

share|improve this answer

A series of Transforms on one object will not solve this, as you've discovered.

You only need one file but you will need to place a link to the file inside itself. Illustrator (and InDesign, iirc) will allow you to place a file inside itself as a link so you can skip the multiple files horatio mentions.

Once you've placed a self-replicating link, you can get all the transforms set up to your liking. Now you can go back to the original and view the transformed edits in almost realtime (every time you save).

In this set-up you may find a couple of things helpful:

  • Set up your transformed sample on a separate artboard so you can export it in isolation, if desired.

  • On your second monitor (a must, imho) you can set up the transformed objects in their own window and use your main monitor to work on the original.

share|improve this answer
Scott posted a similar solution just before you using a similar method (symbols instead of links). The symbols method will work best for me, I believe, but I'm going to test out both and see. Thanks for your input – John Nov 21 '12 at 21:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.