Take the 2-minute tour ×
Graphic Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional graphic designers and non-designers trying to do their own graphic design. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While this is loosely graphic-design related, when doing design for some kind of annotations, one have to work with symbols used as 'reference markers', such as 1 in foo 1. When you need to discuss the decisions regarding these, you may want to use a distinctive word.

But how are, or should, these be called? These are usually numbers, however, this won't make them different from exponents; and saying 'numbers' is not very distinctive when the content body is dealing with or using numbers, too. They could be referred as numbers in the upper index or superscript, however, they not essentially need to be a superscript (especially if you try to experiment with something new in your design). In some cases 'reference markers' as numbers can also be a bad idea, eg. annotating a math text.

How should these be called? Numbers? Numbers in the superscript? Reference-mark symbols? Annotation symbols? Is there a term for these?

share|improve this question
    
+1 it's also a relevant typography terminology question. –  user568458 May 1 '13 at 15:04
    
Well, you already found a name: “reference marker”. I think that if you use that, people will understand what you mean. –  svick May 1 '13 at 16:11
    
Also, aren't references usually written [1]? I think ¹ is used for footnotes, not references. –  svick May 1 '13 at 16:13
    
@svick hm, I think I accidentally merged the meaning of references with (that of) footnotes. Because they are noted similarly; even if they are used for different reasons / in different situations. (And their content is actually different, often.) –  naxa May 1 '13 at 20:16
add comment

2 Answers

The only problem I see with "footnote" and "reference" is that these are slightly restrictive words. "Annotation" is the all-encompassing term for ALL the types of marks you are referring to: footnotes, endnotes, corrections, and captions are all annotations.

So seeing as how you want to avoid over specifying, "annotation marks" is the least leading phrase with respect to type, means, placement etc., and if you want to avoid using words like "numbers" or "letters" try "glyphs."

"What glyph(s) shall we use for marking annotations?"

"How should we style the annotation marks?"

share|improve this answer
add comment

Wikipedia offers 'footnote marker', and no other term under the regular markers' individual pages (like asterisk, dagger, pilcrow and section sign). I guess there is no official collective term for them.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.