Take the 2-minute tour ×
Graphic Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional graphic designers and non-designers trying to do their own graphic design. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to identify a font of which I don't even have an image, only a very distinct memory. I remember it having seen used in technical charts of about the 1950s / 1960s, e.g. diagrams describing the NASA satellite and moon missions. It is sans-serif, all caps, or actually more all small-caps since the letters tend towards a square aspect ratio more typical of small letters. The letters have a very clean appearance with no ornaments, none or almost no variation in line width, straight line ends, and a clear rhythm (without being monospaced). The weight is medium to bold.

Does anyone have an idea what I'm talking about?

Update: Thanks to JennaDesign who found an image containing the font:

Apollo 11 Flight Plan

What I was thinking of is the font used in the bold labels in the lower part of the image in all small-caps, "mission", "edition", "date". Comparing with the title of the document "flight plan", it appears now as if the other labels are actually the small letters of a small caps font, whose large letters are used in the title.

Does someone know what this font is?

share|improve this question
    
This site ( smearedblackink.com/swiss_style_timeline ) might be of use to you; it's about the International Typographic Style, (also known as Swiss style) it's the most prominent graphic design style to have developed in the 50's, hopefully it's of use to you. –  Jenna Nov 24 '13 at 0:40
    
If its the same as the moon mission : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo11Plaque.jpg Then this is Futura. –  OghmaOsiris Nov 24 '13 at 2:14
    
@OghmaOsiris: I think you are right, and I didn't realize this before because on the technical charts it's the "demibold" version, which lacks the sharp angles of the standard form. –  A. Donda Nov 24 '13 at 2:42
add comment

1 Answer

After a hint from OghmaOsiris, I now believe it is the demi bold version of Futura.

enter image description here

The rendering is generated from Futura ND Demi Bold OT.

share|improve this answer
    
An historical aside; technical drawing text comes from the formal handwriting expected on charts from the olden days. I have constructed things ink on paper, and the "font" aimed for is constructed, engineered, stylistic. Sometimes they have slightly rounded terminals; simply because of the "technical-pen-on-paper". Looking for something with that feel, you will want something that is engineered not designed. These fonts will not vary in x-height. Please scroll down here to see expample. graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/24840/… –  Random O'Reilly Nov 24 '13 at 12:22
    
--- and yes; futura would fit nicely with the time. A deliberately design-engineerd cousin would be Hoefler-Frere-Jones´Gotham typography.com/fonts/gotham/overview –  Random O'Reilly Nov 24 '13 at 12:26
    
Thanks @boblet; yes, I thought that the use of this font is meant to emulate earlier standardized handlettering or maybe stencil-based letters. But aren't both Gotham and Optima more designed and less engineered than Futura? Optima has the line width modulations, and the G of Gotham for instance has this additional straight line down on the lower right side. –  A. Donda Nov 24 '13 at 13:26
    
I have to say I never liked Futura that much because it is too obviously constructed, mere geometry, but the demi bold with the sharp points cut off and the forms generally softened has this clean, no-nonsense, technocratic feeling. –  A. Donda Nov 24 '13 at 13:26
    
Yes, I kind of agree with you in respect to Futura. Swiss functionalism. It can work in logos and abbreviations though. The optima example I linked to was not meant as a replacement; I only meant to highlight the sometimes very subtle difference between a constructed font and a designed one. Herman Zapf is a calligrapher; each letter painstakingly designed. Gotham; yes, definitely designed, but to me it has that engineered look. Not saying you should use it; but it takes engineering and adds tiiiny alterations that might give it a little more "omphf" than - for example - futura. –  Random O'Reilly Nov 24 '13 at 13:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.