Take the 2-minute tour ×
Graphic Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Graphic Design professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I realize this post may not be perfect for this SE forum, but seeing that it's a graphics editor I'm having problems with I'm thinking that maybe the right eyes will get to see it.

I'm having big problems with paragraph numbering in my InDesign document. I got handed the document by a colleague and found that all paragraph numbering was static text, which as you may know will make working with the document while keeping numbering updated very tedious..

So I started creating appropriate paragraph numbering styles and began converting. However, to my despair I see that on some pages the paragraph numbering isn't affected by the chapter numbering. So that the first paragraph in chapter 5 is numbered as paragraph 4.2.8, continuing the numbering from chapter 4....

Here's an illustration of the problem:

enter image description here

Does anyone please have any tips of what I could check to try and remove this error?

share|improve this question
1  
I haven't used Paragraph numbering to the extent you're using here (1.x.x), but have you tried placing the cursor on the first paragraph in chapter 5, and from the Paragraph pallette menu, choosing Restart Numbering? –  apex Jan 17 at 3:49
    
@apex thanks for the tip! However, looking at the Paragraph palette I don't see the Restart Numbering option. It's not an option on the palette and I can't find it in the palette options menu. Do you know where to find it? –  AndroidHustle Jan 17 at 7:19
    
looks like you maybe found a work around for yourself, but if you want to try the Restart Numbering, here is a screenshot of where that option is. –  apex Jan 17 at 17:32
add comment

1 Answer

I found that the paragraph numbering got updated to the correct chapter number if I duplicated the paragraph on that same page. Then the duplicate got the 5.2.1 numbering, which I guess will have to suffice, even though I could do without the 2 in the middle...

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.