Graphic Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for Graphic Design professionals, students, and enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know this sounds a stupid question, black is black right?


enter image description here

It's black right? so why are the CMYK Values so far away from black?

share|improve this question
Two different color spaces. Different software will convert from what to the other differently. – DA01 Jan 26 '11 at 18:48
Can't comment, so I'm just gonna leave this here:… – charlie May 8 '11 at 23:22
On the subject of CMYK gotchas, anyone surprised by the 'Rich black' issue should pre-arm themselves by discovering now the difficulties CMYK has replicating pure blues, reds and greens. Here's the issue: a bit more on gamuts: and my personal fave tip on how (not) to deal with this problem: – user568458 Apr 25 '12 at 13:53
If you need very detailed explanations about how to create design with pure and rich black, and what to avoid when creating print-ready files, have a look at this link:… – go-junta Jun 22 '15 at 3:11
up vote 21 down vote accepted

I know this sounds a stupid question, black is black right?

Not really. It all depends on colour model used, ambient light, substrate, and perception. Black is, by definition, no light hitting our eyes. This is very difficult to accomplish. :)

CMYK is a Subtractive Colour Model. It is used in printing because the mixing of the different pigments of ink subtract (absorb) different wavelengths of light.

RGB is an Additive Colour Model. Different wavelengths of light are emitted by whatever technology used by your monitor (nowadays, usually LCD crystals filtering an LED backlight). Technically, it's not additive because the colours do not overlap, but the pixels are small enough that optical mixing causes us to perceive different colours on the screen.

Theoretically, a mixture of pure Cyan, Magenta and Yellow would produce black on the paper, but an actual Black ink is added, basically for two reasons. Firstly, there are always impurities in the CMY colours and the substrate (paper) such that the mixture would be muddy (brownish) and inconsistent. Secondly, 100% of the three inks would be a lot of ink, and cause problems drying/covering in most printing processes.

So, your question boils down to: Why doesn't Photoshop just use 100% Black ink (K) when it converts from RGB values to CMYK values?

Even 0,0,0 RGB on your monitor isn't a "pure" black. In a dark room, you will see that your monitor still glows perceptibly. Likewise, in printing, even 100% Black doesn't absorb all the light hitting the page. So, if we want something to look "really black" we add a bit of Cyan/Magenta/Yellow ink to cover the page more and absorb even more light. In printing we call this Rich Black.

Depending on what colour profile you're using in Photoshop, it takes this into account, and converts the blackest thing it can show on screen to a "richer" printed black. The values of CMYK used are judged to be (by the profile) the most ink that can be used, without causing printing problems, that still looks black.

share|improve this answer

Photoshop handles the RGB ⇒ CMYK conversion according to the colour profiles you've set.

What Photoshop suggests for you here is a variation of rich black. As the name implies, rich black looks richer when printed since it produces more layers of ink instead of just one layer of black (K) ink.

You can tune the conversion in Edit → Convert to profile → Custom CMYK...
For example, to produce max black, turn the Black Generation to Maximum

CMYK settings should of course be set according to your media and printer (or print house).

See also How do I make screenshots look good when printed in CMYK? and my answer, which also links to a article on the subject.

share|improve this answer

In short...

CMYK (Cyan Magenta Yellow and Key black) = colors that can be printed
RGB (Red Green and Blue) = colors that can be displayed on a monitor

Both work with a different color space. In your case that's the closest equivalent color.

share|improve this answer

Pure CMYK black doesn't exist, it's just not printable. Those are the closest values to black you can physically print (using CMYK). RGB on the other hand is intended for Web, and computers have no problem displaying pure black.


Apologies for my unclear answer. I took an apprenticeship at a print shop one summer, and that is simply what I was taught. I was unaware that there were different "levels" of 100%K.

Even I have learned from this question now! I apologize for any confusion I may have caused.

share|improve this answer
But surely in the printing process, to get "pure" black it'd just be 100% K? – Dan Hanly Jan 26 '11 at 17:43
100% K is not black, it actually has a hexdecimal value of #231f20. Pure black is #000000. Again, it's just not possible. – Johannes Jan 26 '11 at 17:45
@Johannes 100% K is plain black and it is achieved when only using black ink at max. It is used e.g. in many magazine body types. What you've described as "a very nice black" is a variation of rich black. – koiyu Jan 26 '11 at 18:10
@Johannes: 100% K doesn't have a fixed RGB value. – e100 Jan 26 '11 at 20:15
"Computers have no problem displaying pure black" -- Quibble, sure they do, and TVs do too. There's always backscatter from the backlighting used. Turn out your lights, but leave your monitor on and see this. This is why successive models of TVs tout their new "Richer Blacks" as the technology improves. – ghoppe Jan 26 '11 at 21:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.