Tell me more ×
Graphic Design Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional graphic designers and non-designers trying to do their own graphic design. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for examples of logos based on Yijing hexagrams/trigrams. The only one I know is the Dharma Initiative logo from the "Lost" series.

Do you know of any others?

share|improve this question
3  
There's this great new search tool for images you may have heard of. It's called "Google". You simply go to Google.com, type in a phase describing what you are looking for and then hit the "Search" button. You'll get results like this: google.com/… – Scott Apr 22 '12 at 9:22
1  
well, there aren't many logo images in that page to be honest – Yisela Apr 24 '12 at 3:21
"You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face." If you can revise this question to address a specific, answerable problem, please flag for a mod to re-open. – Farray Apr 24 '12 at 15:14
@yisela I saw about 10 logos on that page, mostly half way down the page. Not a massive amount, but quite a few. So it seems the answer to your question is: there are some logos based on Yijing hexagrams/trigrams, but not a massive amount. – user568458 Apr 26 '12 at 8:57
1  
@Farray this seems like a legit question to me. It's perfectly common for a designer to encounter an unfamiliar type of iconography and want to know more about the history of how it has been used. If our site is functioning properly you could imagine we would have designers with interests in East Asian iconography who would be knowledgable on this area and happy to share their knowledge. More evidence of prior research would be nice, but that's not a reason to close... Read en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… and you'll see there's depth to this topic – user568458 Apr 26 '12 at 9:42
show 1 more comment

closed as not a real question by Jack, Farray Apr 24 '12 at 15:11

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.