Skip to main content
added 559 characters in body
Source Link
Billy Kerr
  • 89.5k
  • 6
  • 83
  • 179

On inspection of the font "DIN Alternate" which is offered as "free" on various dubious websites, I was able to extract this information from the font file itself:

©Dutch Design: Albert-Jan Pool, 1995. Published by FontShop International FontFont release 15DIN-RegularAlternateDINRegularAlternate

So, yes it would seem to be copyright, and it looks likeI would assume you need to buy a licence. So, contact the publisher

Some of these free font sites don't seem to care if fonts are offered legally or not, which is why I would never use them. Other more responsible free font sites do display the licences, such as dafont, and fontlibrary. My suggestion would be only to use sites which actually refer to the licences.

One of these so-called "free" font sites, which I shall not name, offers this laughable disclaimer.

By downloading fonts from our site or using them you agree you have read and understood that the font or dingbat copyrights belongs to the designer of the related product. In cases where there are no copyright notices, you need to assume that the font is copyrighted. Use of the fonts is at your sole responsibility. We do not take any responsibility and we are not liable for any damage caused through use of the fonts . . .

On inspection of the font "DIN Alternate" which is offered as "free" on various dubious websites, I was able to extract this information from the font file itself:

©Dutch Design: Albert-Jan Pool, 1995. Published by FontShop International FontFont release 15DIN-RegularAlternateDINRegularAlternate

So, yes it would seem to be copyright, and it looks like you need to buy a licence. So, contact the publisher

On inspection of the font "DIN Alternate" which is offered as "free" on various dubious websites, I was able to extract this information from the font file itself:

©Dutch Design: Albert-Jan Pool, 1995. Published by FontShop International FontFont release 15DIN-RegularAlternateDINRegularAlternate

So, yes it would seem to be copyright, and I would assume you need to buy a licence. So, contact the publisher

Some of these free font sites don't seem to care if fonts are offered legally or not, which is why I would never use them. Other more responsible free font sites do display the licences, such as dafont, and fontlibrary. My suggestion would be only to use sites which actually refer to the licences.

One of these so-called "free" font sites, which I shall not name, offers this laughable disclaimer.

By downloading fonts from our site or using them you agree you have read and understood that the font or dingbat copyrights belongs to the designer of the related product. In cases where there are no copyright notices, you need to assume that the font is copyrighted. Use of the fonts is at your sole responsibility. We do not take any responsibility and we are not liable for any damage caused through use of the fonts . . .

Source Link
Billy Kerr
  • 89.5k
  • 6
  • 83
  • 179

On inspection of the font "DIN Alternate" which is offered as "free" on various dubious websites, I was able to extract this information from the font file itself:

©Dutch Design: Albert-Jan Pool, 1995. Published by FontShop International FontFont release 15DIN-RegularAlternateDINRegularAlternate

So, yes it would seem to be copyright, and it looks like you need to buy a licence. So, contact the publisher