Skip to main content
Graphic Design

Return to Answer

Clean up grammar and wording
Source Link
edit approved Jun 28, 2019 at 18:39
Josiah Nunemaker
edit approved Jun 28, 2019 at 18:39
Josiah Nunemaker
  • 101
  • 2

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you. You are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on itpatch is a patchstain to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedlybe balanced, notshouldn't destroy itthe image, and trying toshould alter it as lesslittle as possible.

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • TheIs the chosen image is the right one?
  • TheCan the design elements (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a betterbetter place to be located without altering the image?

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should look can be asked. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There'sThere are more than enough options before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design elements (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better place to be located without altering the image?

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated. You are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A patch is a stain to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must be balanced, shouldn't destroy the image, and should alter it as little as possible.

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • Is the chosen image the right one?
  • Can the design elements (not the patch) to be placed on top find a better place to be located without altering the image?

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the questions such as where to locate the patch or how it should look can be asked. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There are more than enough options before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

edited body
Source Link
user120647
user120647

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design elementelements (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better better place to be located without altering the image?

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design element (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better place to be located without altering the image

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design elements (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better place to be located without altering the image?

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

added 7 characters in body
Source Link
user120647
user120647

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are taking for granted the existence of another elementcomponent as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design element (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better place to be located without altering the image

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are for granted the existence of another element as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design element (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better place to be located without altering the image

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

A patch is always a scar on an image

The question is wrongly formulated, you are taking for granted the existence of another component as something of correct use and valid as a design element in any image: a patch.

I think before asking if you behead a character inside an image with a patch, you should ask:

Is it necessary to use a patch over an image?

One of my principles in design is to try to avoid as much as possible the use of patches on an image. Why?

  • The photographer has used much of his professionalism to locate, frame and arrange each of the elements in the composition of that image. A stain on it is a patch to the exercise of another professional.
  • As decorative as it may be, a patch is always a scar on an image
  • Any design element that is placed on top of an image must accompany it balancedly, not destroy it and trying to alter it as less as possible

Before using a patch on an image, a series of questions can be asked:

  • The chosen image is the right one?
  • The design element (not the patch) to be placed on top can find a better place to be located without altering the image

If after all this analysis, the use of a patch is inevitable, then the following questions can be formulated, such as where to locate the patch or how it should be. Try to make the patch part of the identity of that image by using design elements to integrate it. There's more than enough before falling into the blurred destructive smoke cloud that occupies almost a quarter of the image.

enter image description here

edited body
Source Link
user120647
user120647
edited body
Source Link
user120647
user120647
Source Link
user120647
user120647