Return to Answer

1. Break the unfinished regular hexagon. It's so near complete that it looks disturbing.

2. The biggest circle presents somehow more remarkable member than the others. Let there be in both sides of him as much torque (not as many circles, but as much power to cause rotation around the midpoint of the most remarkable member) - I guess it will not change the meaning

1. Break the unfinished regular hexagon. It's so near complete that it looks disturbing.

2. The biggest circle presents somehow more remarkable member than the others. Let him be the center of the mass - In other words: if there's a rotation axis in the midpoint of the biggest circle the torques caused by the weights of all other items (including the lines) would cancel each other. I guess it doesn't change the meaning of the graph.

I moved a couple of items to satisfy requirement 1. and approximately also requirement 2.

1. Break the unfinished regular hexagon. It's so near complete that it looks disturbing.

2. The biggest circle presents somehow more remarkable member than the others. Let there be in both sides of him as much torque (not as many circles, but as much power to cause rotation) in the geometry - I guess it will not change the meaning

1. Break the unfinished regular hexagon. It's so near complete that it looks disturbing.

2. The biggest circle presents somehow more remarkable member than the others. Let there be in both sides of him as much torque (not as many circles, but as much power to cause rotation around the midpoint of the most remarkable member) - I guess it will not change the meaning

Break the unfinished regular hexagon. It's so near complete that it looks disturbing.

1. Break the unfinished regular hexagon. It's so near complete that it looks disturbing.

2. The biggest circle presents somehow more remarkable member than the others. Let there be in both sides of him as much torque (not as many circles, but as much power to cause rotation) in the geometry - I guess it will not change the meaning