Timeline for Indesign: include bleed marks, and bleed
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 18:27 | answer | added | Kevin Perera | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 4, 2015 at 12:59 | answer | added | Anthony | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:44 | vote | accept | Adam Thompson | ||
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:42 | answer | added | Scott | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:38 | comment | added | Adam Thompson | Got it. I don't do much print design, so this is good to know. | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:30 | comment | added | Scott | Yes. But you need crop marks to tell the printer where to trim the piece. You need both. And crop marks are way more important than bleed marks. | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:25 | comment | added | Adam Thompson |
Strange. I get the desired results when using crop marks instead of bleed marks. Maybe I don't quite understand bleed. Bleed is the extra printed area that is to be cut off after printing, is it not?
|
|
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:22 | comment | added | Scott | Based upon those screen shots.. there's no reason why the top settings shouldn't show both the marks and the bleed (you should be including crop marks as well). I think you may be mistaking the bleed marks in the top settings with crop marks. You should use BOTH options. | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:21 | history | edited | Adam Thompson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:20 | comment | added | Adam Thompson | I'm setting the PDF options to include Bleed, and only bleed marks. | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:15 | comment | added | Scott | errr.. huh? Are you setting the PDF Options to include Bleed and all marks? | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 16:14 | history | asked | Adam Thompson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |