Timeline for Can I reduce the file size of an SVG to be closer to its JPEG equivalent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 at 13:23 | comment | added | Ilmari Karonen | As with SVGOMG (from Dom's answer), here also the biggest savings seem to come from disabling xlink, which, as a side effect, completely deletes the embedded image. Obviously, replacing the image with a gradient isn't really something you can expect an automated tool to do. | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 20:29 | comment | added | flaviut | This is not quite the same tool as mentioned in the question, but it is made by the same author and is located on the same domain. The author's link does have a link to this tool, but I didn't notice it until I posted my answer; I didn't delete it since it is still useful. By manual adjustment, I mean that I unchecked several boxes (combine paths, remove ids) to make the output correct and lowered the decimal places to further improve size. | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 16:57 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | Welcome to Graphic Design SE. Note that the asker mentioned this very tool in the question. Not that this invalidates this answer, but you can put it into perspective. Also, what do you mean by manual adjustment? | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 15:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 12, 2015 at 16:58 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2015 at 15:22 | history | answered | flaviut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |