Timeline for Image looks embossed when converted to SVG
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2022 at 18:51 | history | bounty ended | Scott | ||
| Jan 16, 2022 at 13:30 | comment | added | Wolff | Just want to add that the overlapping technique isn't only recommended for web publication but also for print. Tight fitting paths can mess up the trapping process. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/ with https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/ with https://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 23, 2016 at 14:17 | comment | added | Andrea Lazzarotto | A nice side effect (IMHO) is that the image on the left has less points, therefore the resulting SVG would be smaller. :) | |
| May 18, 2016 at 4:49 | history | edited | joojaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2016 at 23:34 | comment | added | CreativeMind | @joojaa It does look like the issue was related to the artifacts, thank you for the schooling on that. I did try the Offset Path option, but ended up opening up the original file and tried the Image Trace again and found an advance setting option under Image Trace, called Method, that changed the paths from cutout to stacked. | |
| Jan 6, 2016 at 23:10 | vote | accept | CreativeMind | ||
| Jan 6, 2016 at 8:37 | history | edited | joojaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 6, 2016 at 8:27 | history | edited | joojaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 64 characters in body
|
| Jan 6, 2016 at 8:21 | history | answered | joojaa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
