Timeline for Photoshop Resolution for Web Design?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2012 at 18:07 | history | edited | e100 |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 8, 2011 at 17:43 | comment | added | horatio | I think one point that hasn't been touched upon is tool behavior: the smoothness of a selection made with the selection tools will be nicer @ at higher pixel counts, especially with anti-aliasing enabled. So if you are silhouetting an image, you might want to scale up the pixel dimensions before making your selections. | |
| Feb 8, 2011 at 14:25 | comment | added | e100 | I am surprised how entrenched the 72dpi myth is. Even as a measure of a screen's pixel density, it's surely been irrelevant for some years. Related: graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/95/… | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 15:29 | comment | added | DA01 | DPI, as a concept, is unnecessary for the web. At least not now. Perhaps if/when the day comes that OSes map screen graphics to actual physical measurements independent of the screen density. | |
| Feb 7, 2011 at 0:03 | vote | accept | Brandon - Free Palestine | ||
| Feb 6, 2011 at 19:49 | comment | added | Hanna | 300 is great for print, but unnecessary for the web. | |
| Feb 6, 2011 at 19:37 | answer | added | duncmc | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 6, 2011 at 19:31 | answer | added | dkuntz2 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 6, 2011 at 18:35 | history | asked | Brandon - Free Palestine | CC BY-SA 2.5 |