Timeline for How to create buttons with editable text that are re sizable (to accommodate longer/shorter text) on all browsers [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2012 at 21:32 | comment | added | o_O | Isn't that what the FAQ is for and mods are for? To make sure things are running correctly? What good is a mod if they aren't even going to correct people when they're clearly wrong. Change the FAQ for what is allowed and then you won't have this problem. | |
| Aug 24, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | Farray | @RKS I saw your flag but am not overriding the community's votes to close (in addition to the close votes, it was also flagged for close by others). If it gets enough re-open votes, it will be reopened without mod intervention. | |
| Aug 22, 2012 at 23:07 | comment | added | o_O | Flagged for reopening since the FAQ clearly states this is on-topic. You're not competing with SO. This is a separate website from SO so even if more people will see it doesn't mean it doesn't belong here. I'm sure SEO and rich content for this site is just as valuable to SE as it is on SO. | |
| Aug 22, 2012 at 16:15 | vote | accept | Clay Nichols | ||
| Aug 22, 2012 at 15:07 | comment | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | Expanding on what DA01 said, in principle, the technicalities of implementing a design make sense here. But in practice, these questions get better answered on SO (stackoverflow.com): CSS expert front-end developers have SO accounts and not GD accounts (they make the designs they're given); web designer-developers who know CSS here have SO accounts in addition to their GD accounts. It doesn't make sense for us to try to compete with or re-create the masses of great CSS content and expertise that already exists on stackoverflow.com - better to use each site for what each site is best at | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 18:40 | history | edited | Clay Nichols | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; edited title
|
| Aug 21, 2012 at 12:18 | history | closed |
Scott Joonas Jack DA01 lawndartcatcher |
off topic | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 8:27 | comment | added | Joonas | I was talking about the technique. Maybe the "nothing to do with" line was a little too strict. The way it is related, is that it is the method to stitch up the design, and then we get back to the coding... | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 7:29 | answer | added | o_O | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 21, 2012 at 7:13 | comment | added | o_O | Boo. Using HTML and CSS is as much Design as anything else. How is it not? Since it's done with code instead of a layered PSD? | |
| Aug 20, 2012 at 15:06 | comment | added | DA01 | The craft of making what you design is absolutely related to graphic design. That said, I agree that this question would be better served on SO. | |
| Aug 20, 2012 at 12:03 | comment | added | cornishninja | +1 for moving this to stackoverflow. The others are right about being able to do this with CSS3. No need for images. There are plenty of examples all over the net these days. Google for “CSS3 buttons.” :-) | |
| Aug 19, 2012 at 15:14 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 21, 2012 at 12:22 | |||||
| Aug 19, 2012 at 15:13 | answer | added | Scott | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 19, 2012 at 14:19 | comment | added | Joonas | This question is much better fit for stackoverflow. Technique for making a button with html and css has nothing to do with graphic design. | |
| Aug 19, 2012 at 13:39 | history | asked | Clay Nichols | CC BY-SA 3.0 |