Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:53 vote accept gabrielle
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 vote accept gabrielle
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:53
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52 vote accept gabrielle
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:52
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:12 answer added Vinny timeline score: 2
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:07 answer added joojaa timeline score: 0
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:06 comment added Westside Unfortunately it sounds like your client is talking nonsense. A vector with no actor points isn't a thing. Even primitive shapes like rectangles and ellipses are made of anchor points. Good luck!
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:02 comment added gabrielle Thanks for your awnser. They want a AI file, but the want the logo with no anchor point, like a solid object, while conserving the vector properties and the gradient and so on. That doesnt make sense right? Im looking for confirmation that it doesnt make sense actually. Unless someone know magic.
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:57 comment added Westside It sounds like the real question might be what file format they want, rather than how that file should be structured. It's also possible that they don't know what they want. Placing one AI file inside another (as you would with an image) might achieve what they want, but that's just a guess.
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:47 comment added gabrielle And the they want to keep the vector properties. Basically they want to turn a group logo that has colors and gradient into a whole object but keep vector properties and colors. And for some reasons they dont want to use the group option.
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:45 comment added gabrielle I'm actually wondering if this is even possible. My client is asking for the impossible I think. He wants one whole object all attached together like as an irreversible option.. But the object is composed of a gradient and has 2 colors. From my side I think that the only options are merge or group. But i'd like to know if anyone knows a magic way?
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:42 comment added emax What do you mean 'join together'? What properties this object should have?
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:29 review First posts
Jun 8, 2017 at 9:10
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:23 comment added Westside It sounds like what you are describing is a group, why have rejected grouping as an option?
Jun 8, 2017 at 8:15 history asked gabrielle CC BY-SA 3.0