1

I am wondering if there is a way, in Photoshop CC, to select multiple layers and then resize them relative to their current location.

For example, if I have 2 equal sized squares next to each other, I want to be able to select them both, then drag the bottom right corner to make them smaller without the location of their top left corners moving.

I realise that you can use shift+click to select multiple layers, then transform them together, but the result of this is that they get smaller and the space between them also gets smaller.

I hope this makes sense.

| improve this question | | | | |
1

It sounds like you are saying you want to select multiple objects, layers, and have each layer resize respectively to its own upper left corner, correct?

That’s not possible in PS because whether you select multiple 'items', (areas of pixels) and/or layers, there's only one transformation box, having one origin (the point or side that doesn't move).

e.g. let’s say you had a TicTacToe configuration of squares, 4", and you wanted to keep it 4" but reduce each by 50% thereby doubling the space between each of the nine squares.

Yes, in illustrator, no in Photoshop because Photoshop is for photos and really doesn’t have the shape manipulation power that illustrator has (pathfinder, align, etc.)

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • 1
    Well, in Illustrator this would be possible via Effects > Distort & Transform > Transform – AAGD Nov 12 '17 at 16:59
  • You’re absolutely right. Illustrator will have the layout manipulation capabilities. – Randy Zeitman Nov 12 '17 at 17:03
  • Thank you for your answer. You are correct in your understanding of what I meant, so I have confidence in your answer when you say it can't be done. At least now I know. Thanks again. – Marc Nov 14 '17 at 15:30
  • Thank you but me understanding the problem doesn't mean my answer will be right. Didn't AAGD have it right? – Randy Zeitman Nov 14 '17 at 16:14
  • His comment relates to Illustrator, but I specifically needed a photoshop solution in this case. – Marc Nov 20 '17 at 9:40
1

You could actually scale by numbers rather than dragging handles. Scaling each rectangle by the same percentage with the origin set at the top left would retain any spacing between them.

enter image description here

You'd have to scale each layer separately, which may be an issue fr a great many layers. However, if it's just a couple layers, this would work great.

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • +1 for this as although as you say it can be a bit long winded for a lot of layers, it is a nice way to consistantly size a number of shapes if there aren't too many. Thanks. – Marc Nov 20 '17 at 9:41

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.