0

I created a fine arts piece made with 0.03 micron pen and mechanical pencils. I want to showcase the fine lines and tiny dots in my work. However no matter how much I play around with the settings, I can't seem to get my scanned piece to look the same as the real version. The main issue is that the very fine lines look broken, and the small dots merge with each other.

It's done in black ink on white paper.

I scanned the piece as a colour JPEG, in 600 dpi.

In Photoshop, I have tried - adjusting curves. This makes my background darker but my lines become overly dark and they still look broken. - adding an unsharpen mask at 93%, radius 2.7 and 1 threshold level - added 2 unsharpen mask just for kicks - tried the other sharpen mask settings

I'd be very grateful if you have any advice for me - this problem has left me stuck for a while. Much thanks!

  • 3
    To me it seems like this is a problem with your scanner, not with photoshop. – Summer Oct 1 '18 at 11:27
  • 2
    Please edit your question to add some images at 100% zoom so we can at least see the issue. – Luciano Oct 1 '18 at 11:37
  • 1
    Hi Julia. Welcome to GDSE. This sounds like a scanner issue. What kind of scanner is it? Have you considered having your drawing scanned using professional scanning equipment. I honestly don't think this has anything to do with Photoshop. – Billy Kerr Oct 1 '18 at 11:56
  • 1
    Are you sure its not just a pigma "micron" technical pen with a 0.03 tip. Which is different form a 0.03 micron line ;) – joojaa Oct 1 '18 at 13:36
  • 2
    Can you post an image of the problem? – 13ruce Oct 1 '18 at 15:05
0

I don't think you're asking for a reasonable result from your equipment. You are scanning in a line that is 0.001181103 inches wide (0.03 microns), yet you are scanning at 600ppi, so your scan resolution is off by an order of magnitude. The scan is dividing an inch into hundredths, while your drawing line is dividing an inch into ten-thousandths. It's like looking for a needle from across the street. Raise the resolution of the scan if possible.



Keep in mind, though, that even if the scan were perfect, a printer can only produce a dot of a minimum size, which is probably around .5-1 micron, but even with 0.03 micron dots, the printer will probably only place them based on its resolution of 300, 600, etc. per inch, which is also likely to create some unwanted visual effects.

  • 1
    Are you sure that op does not refer to a 0.03 Pigma Micron Technical pen so most probably referning to 003 pen which is 0.15 mm thick and not 3e-5 mm (oh and one micron has four more zeroes than your text) – joojaa Oct 1 '18 at 13:27
  • Gotcha. In that case I think we need to see what the problem is to dig in further. – 13ruce Oct 1 '18 at 15:04
  • 1
    I think it is going to still be the same problem. if the OP reproduces this at anything less than 100% actual size, then we have smaller-than-a-pixel problems again. In addition. JPEG is a bad choice for line art. – Yorik Oct 31 '18 at 13:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.