I am searching for a font for annotations in figures of articles that I am writing. I want to use it for labelling of axes and ticks, but also for legends and subtitles of charts and the like. The articles are for print and screen.

Trying to make an informed decision beyond my own subjective feeling, which aspects should I consider when choosing a font?

  • 3
    Possible duplicate of What are best practices for choosing and pairing fonts?
    – user120647
    Jan 7, 2019 at 13:26
  • 1
    Agreed, my question is close to it, but I do think it's different. First, that particular question focuses a lot on font-pairing, which is not my question or only part of it. Second, I am asking this question because other resources I found on font selection would tell me how a font is well suited for body text or headings, but I never found anything particular focussed on figures. Maybe the answer is simply: no, there is nothing specific to take into account for figures. Jan 7, 2019 at 14:21
  • What font are you using for the rest of the article? Do you expect any issues if you used the same one?
    – J.E
    Jan 7, 2019 at 14:28
  • @J.E at the moment I am using a slab serif for the body and headings of the article. I could of course use the same, or choose another font that I like and based on What are best practices for choosing and pairing fonts?. But I thought there may be objective criteria for this special use case, something like "go for sans serif because X" or "choose one with high x-height because Y" or something similar. Jan 7, 2019 at 15:31

3 Answers 3


Any font that is considered well suited for body copy should function perfectly well for annotations, captions, footnotes, etc. However, the smaller the type will appear in print or especially on screen, the more likely you should consider using a simple, sans-serif font. As the glyphs are scaled down for a screen, serifs may cause unexpected visual artifacts, or may disappear altogether. There are fonts designed specifically for small print or that will render legibly even when only a few pixels tall. Aside from that, there isn't much reason I can think of to stray from your main body font unless you just want to.


As a technical illustrator, I tend towards my annotations fonts being sans-serif, simple, and clean, with high legibility even at smaller scales, and minimal or no decoration. I have, on occasion, when I know my final target output is only print, used a simple, non-slab serifed font, but that's pretty rare for me.

Although I've a fair few issues with a number of the conventions of mechanical and architectural draughting (where I've spent a lot of time) and the lettering thereof (Seriously - all caps? Really folks legibility, clarity and beauty matter, you know!) as practised here in the US, they have typically preferred simple, clear linear hands and fonts - originally for ease of hand-lettering, and later both by convention and for ease of legibility, and one can learn from this that when the focus should be the illustrative content to which the annotation is hierarchically subordinate (but supportive) then one should seek hands/typefaces/fonts which are highly legible, simple and clear, and which eschew focal attention or limelight - the textual content is key, the design of the letterforms in this case should basically disappear. This doesn't imply that you cannot use a well developed typeface (I've used Helvetica for annotations before, and it works quite nicely) but rather that in this use-case, the typography is subservient to the extraction of meaning, rather than the design being predominant.

See several examples:

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

Hope this helps a little.


Whitney by Hoefler is one of my favorite fonts for this type of work. It can fit a lot of text and remain legible with its sans serif style, large x-height, and condensed and narrow weights. It offers multiple styles of indices which are already well centered and kerned so that saves a lot of time. Also, it's available for web.

enter image description here enter image description here

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.