1

I have the highly and low detailed pictures:

enter image description here enter image description here

And I would like to make a smoothly transition between them, for exapmle, on the one side. I put them on top of each other (as laeyrs), make "Match Color", set "Fade", then add a layer mask and use "Gradient tool" for edge transparency. But nevertheless the result is not very good, especially when zooming in (last image). So, maybe there is a way to improve this (Even using programs other than Photoshop if necessary.)

enter image description here enter image description here

2
  • Maybe not an easy question, but what exactly is “not good” about your attempt? Or why not just use the high detail picture? Sep 2 at 22:02
  • I'm trying to make some highly detailed surface area among global Earth surface texture for a flight simulator, and the main purpose is the colour matching and making a smoothly transition between high and low textures as best as possible. I don't like transparency in my attempt. Maybe there're better ways. Sep 3 at 9:01

1 Answer 1

1

In my opinion, your process is correct.

What you could try is, taking your high-resolution image, resampling it to, let's say half resolution, and making an intermediate step. Fade it the same way you did.


Complementing using the lens blur. https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/adjusting-image-sharpness-blur.html

The lens blur can make an increasing blur. You can make a selection or prepare a gradient to determine the zones that will recieve the blur. Apply it to a high-resolution image and stop when the look is similar to the low-resolution image.

Apply the low-resolution image as you already did.

5
  • Thanks, I'll try. What I don't like in my attempt is transparency. I think about some blur with variable pixelization (if it's possible to do). Sep 3 at 9:12
  • 1
    Photoshop has a feature “lens blur” by which a soft mask can control the blur radius. Sep 3 at 9:59
  • Another idea is to use map features (eg roads or edges of fields) to transition from one source to another. Sep 3 at 10:01
  • @KrisVanBael, thanks, the first idea can be useful. Sep 3 at 14:20
  • @Rafael, thanks, I'd like to try this. Should I use the lens blur after my result with the gradient operation or instead of it? And sorry, what do you mean in "apply the low-resolution image"? Sep 4 at 19:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.