I'm trying to find a good font that pairs well with a logo that uses 'Kursivschrift.' While I'm not a fan of the font due to the excessive amount of kerning required to make it work, it is the main logogtype.

Here's the idea: I want to find two fonts, or a good family, that fit the look of Kursivschrift (I think a Sans-serif and Serif would give the most versatility) so that I don't have to use Kursivschrift as a headline font, it can just be the logotype.

Kursivscrift example

At least one of the fonts chosen has to be used with the logotype as a tagline of sorts.

If it helps at all... I've been playing around with URW Grotesk and its sister URW Antiqua (just not sure about the choice):

URW Grotesk example

  • 1
    Do the logo and the tagline both use a lower-case w? Kursivschrift's w is ... um ... esoteric, which restricts the choices if that letter also has to appear in a more regular form. Commented Oct 31, 2013 at 18:04
  • I noticed that too. No, logo brand letters include: ieou and bhnpqst. The plan is to leave the logotype as is and not use Kursivschrift for anything else, but that means I need some fonts that pair well with that for other design work but don't look disjointed when comparing. Commented Oct 31, 2013 at 18:54

1 Answer 1


In situations where you have a face with very strong personality, the best approach for a companion face is to go to the opposite extreme: a plain sans that isn't trying to assert itself. Kursivschrift has relatively narrow proportions with a severely vertical axis and no slope, so that it almost looks like it's leaning backwards. Its x-height is large.

Your tagline/heading face will work best if it is also on the narrow side and also has a vertical stress and a large x-height. Kursivschrift is quite dark, so your tagline font must be light. (In a tagline, you're not trying for a match; you want a contrast.)

URW Grotesk is drawn a little wider than Kursivschrift and has a lower x-height, so to my eyes it collides, rather than contrasts or harmonizes, and the bold is certainly much too dark to use for the tagline.

When you know there will be many items to typeset but you don't know what they will all be, my advice is to pick OpenType families for both headings and text that provide a good selection of weights and preferably have condensed and/or extended forms.

In this particular case I would go with Myriad or (if you need to be very conservative) Helvetica Neue Thin Condensed for the companion sans. Myriad has a wide range of styles, and the Helvetica Neue family is massive.

The obvious pairing for Myriad is Minion, but Arno (also by Robert Slimbach) is a more recent and less-used face that is also available in light, regular, semibold and bold weights. Both are very readable and will pair equally well with the narrower Helvetica Neue fonts. Importantly, both families now have optical sets, drawn explicitly for each of caption, text, subhead and display sizes.

If you've not experienced setting serif type using size-specific fonts, I highly recommend it. You may find that you have less need of a sans for your headings and subheads when your serif face has fonts drawn explicitly for those sizes (and don't, therefore, look clunky).

  • I think myriad works pretty well. Helvetica Neue Thin Condensed doesn't work well when scaling with a logo. I'll have to look at if Minion or Arno is a better fit with the brand. Thanks, Alan. Commented Nov 11, 2013 at 22:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.