0

Here are some types that i can think of on top of my head:

  1. Typography.
  2. Illustration.
  3. Initials.
  4. Abstract.
  5. Symbol/Iconic.
  6. 3dish
  7. flat/simplified
  8. hand drawn
  9. animal
  10. ...what more..

I have always thought of creating a list with all categories..as there are some categories i don't excel at, like illustrations, so i want to make sure and be mindful of that when looking for best approach to a logo.

Also it serves as quick guide in coming up with very unique ideas and assessing the right direction.

closed as too broad by Scott, benteh, DA01, Ilan, Yisela Jun 15 '14 at 20:44

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • There is no one answer to this. The number of 'types' are infinite and entirely based on personal opinion as to what constitutes a 'type'. – DA01 Jun 15 '14 at 17:25
  • I mean if we tried we could surely generalize certain mega types. Like typography vs 3dish icons are different enough. Sure there is no quick answer to this question, but i am hoping to get wiki style answers that crowd can expand upon and add and create knowledge. – Muhammad Umer Jun 15 '14 at 17:45
  • This surely off-topic: "To prevent your question from being flagged and possibly removed, avoid asking subjective questions where ... every answer is equally valid." Lists have always been discouraged in Stack Exchange. – Andrew Leach Jun 15 '14 at 18:03
  • 1
    Actually, no, this is quite specific. The fact that the OP doesn't understand what he's asking gives us the opportunity to put him straight, and I think that's what we're here for, no? – Alan Gilbertson Jun 15 '14 at 19:49
  • Muhammad, now that @AlanGilbertson has so excellently pointed you to the right question through his answer, would you consider modifying your question accordingly? – CuriousWebDeveloper Jun 15 '14 at 20:28
1

Most of the types you list are not "types of logo design."

Logos ("marks" is the better and more general term) fall into only three major categories:

  • A logo is a graphic, abstract or illustrative, that uniquely identifies an entity such as an organization or project:

logos

  • A logotype (sometimes called a "lettermark") is a mark created from a few letters, usually custom drawn and often combined with some kind of graphic (this image courtesy of katielily.wordpress.com):

logotypes

  • A wordmark is a mark consisting only of type, usually the name of the organization it represents, often in a custom or modified typeface:

wordmarks

The dividing line between a logotype and a wordmark is slightly fuzzy, because a logotype (the IBM and FedEx logotypes are good examples) can also be the name of the company. The generally accepted definition is that a wordmark contains one or more actual words (Microsoft's wordmark).

All the rest of your "types" are simply different styles or fashions. Until the Chase Bank logo, virtually all logos were representational or illustrative in some way. Paul Rand's original UPS logo included a knot of string, for example, and the current logo is clearly representational (although it violates one of the canons of logo design, to the intense irritation of Paul Rand fans):

UPS logos

Fashion, far more than most of us admit, is technology-driven. "Because I can" is the unstated reason for many a poorly-conceived logo. The wealth of 3D-esque, gradient- and shading-filled logos that are meaningless or indecipherable when reduced to pure black and white is testament to this.

There are rules about designing a mark or logo:

  • It must look good as a flat monochrome graphic. This is the cardinal rule. Variations on the theme can introduce color and/or gradients (see the VW logotype above), but if it doesn't look good monochrome, everything else is putting lipstick on a garden slug.

  • Simple is better. If a logo has fine detail, you will have to create several versions for viewing at different sizes.

  • It must look strong reversed out of a black background. This is a corollary of the first rule. Both rules force you to create a design that is graphically strong enough to work as a badge for the client.

  • It must be scalable. The nightmare of inheriting a "logo" "designed" by "the guy/girl who did our website" is that it's almost always a small png or a jpeg, unusable for any other purpose than a web page.

There are also rules about what to avoid.

You have to know what they are before you can break them with impunity.

Don't confuse fashion trends with basic technique. Both have their place in your toolbox, but the basics are infinitely more important.

  • Interesting (and valid) way to tackle the question! – DA01 Jun 15 '14 at 20:05
  • Oh, that said, I don't know that 'logotype' has a specific definition. It's common to see it used as a synonym of wordmark. – DA01 Jun 15 '14 at 20:06
  • Yes, as I said it's a bit fuzzy. What I gave here was the usage I see most commonly and that's well understood by colleagues and friends who specialize in this field. – Alan Gilbertson Jun 15 '14 at 20:12

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.