I am working remotely with a client; deliverable product is supposed to be a printable PDF.

The problem: The design has a colored background, and over this, an image with transparency. On screen and on my home printer, everything looks perfect. However when my client prints it out, she reports that the transparency isn't right and that a faint box (background) around the image is showing up. This happened for her on two different printers. It's not fully white or solid, just lighter than it should be.

I'm having a hard time troubleshooting because I can't reproduce the problem. My printer handles it fine. Things I have tried:

  • Changing the linked image type. I have made transparent .psd, .tif, and .png versions in Photoshop and linked them into InDesign, all with the same result. In all cases choosing the least amount of compression possible.
  • Embedding the linked image. Didn't help.
  • Changing the Transparency Blend Space back and forth from RGB to CMYK. Didn't help.
  • Changing the Transparency Flattener Preset to High Resolution.
  • Changing the version of Acrobat compatibility from 5 to 7.
  • Changing Adobe PDF Preset from High Quality Print to Smallest File Size.
  • Changing Export Layers back and forth from Visible to Visible & Printable.
  • Adding PDF/X-1a:2001 standard to the export criteria

I am at my wits' end, I don't know what else to try, since I can't even make it happen. Client reports that she CAN force the document to print correctly by choosing "print as image," which leads me to suspect the issue might lie in how different printers are interpreting the file's transparency. Advice appreciated; I'd like it to work on all printers.

  • one thing you can do to mitigate this, especially if it is just the client's preview and not an artifact at proof/print time is create a clipping or alpha mask that stands off from the edges of the image by a few px, and apply that clipping mask to the inDesign box. This will just change the shape of the off-colored box, but it may not be as objectionable for the client. Most printers have "vivid"; "presentation graphics"; "screw up you color" presets in the drivers. They are usually ways for the print driver to ignore or screw up things that matter.
    – Yorik
    Commented Jun 25, 2015 at 19:03
  • I think you're kind of stuck. Sounds like it's an issue with the client's color calibration or lack of print technology. For example, some things need a Postscript level 3 printer to print correctly. Sounds like she may not have that and the "Print as image" is using a software RIP to just send raster data to the printer, (getting around any postscript issues. I don't know that you can correct a client's hardware which just has poor support.
    – Scott
    Commented Jun 25, 2015 at 21:51

2 Answers 2


If you see a pale gray background:

This problem often happens when using a layer mask but not a C100-M100-Y100-K100 black to cover your image on the layer mask.

As a result, there will be a very small transparency since not all 4 channels are covered at 100%; some will be covered at 95%, some at 99%, etc. It's very hard to see on screen because it can appear as a very very pale gray, almost white. This is amplified on some printers.

If you used a layer mask, try to change your black to 100% in all the CMYK value or re-do it with that registration black.

It's not the case here, but sometimes using JPG also does this in some editing software like Microsoft Word; the compression can add that kind of effect because of the small pixel distortion.

Use 100% values in CMYK black to cover your layer mask

If you want to verify if this is the issue, you can make a test by flattening your PSD file on a white background, and using the "color picker" on the white area. Look at your info window and see if there is any small percentage of CMYK there. If you see something, that means your transparency isn't fully transparent.

Verifying layer mask 100% transparency

If you see a pale border:

It could be that you didn't remove 1 line of pixels all around on your layer mask or didn't delete it. Sometimes doing a "select all" will still leave that line and it's not always visible because of your gray artboard.

Make sure to select OUTSIDE the frame and add some black on your layer mask in this portion too, all around your image. Or to delete this.

Select outside the image to remove faint line

If none of the above are the issue

If you used transparency in InDesign on another background, try rasterizing that image with its background instead or do it in Photoshop.

You won't lose much quality, your client is not using any press but a small office laser or inkjet printer probably. And that's also what's your client is doing when doing a "print as image" in a way.

  • Thank you for your response! There is no masking so unfortunately I don't think the RGB/CMYK black values are the issue in place. Regarding rasterizing, is there a way to do it within InDesign? I'd rather not trust Photoshop's conversion to the spot color used in Indesign.
    – Meg
    Commented Jun 26, 2015 at 15:31
  • You could convert your spot already to CMYK, you'll avoid these issues. I don't know if that can be done directly in InDesign, hopefully someone here will answer you about it. If it was my files, I would probably open the PDF in Illustrator and do it there, or modify that part of the design in Illustrator and Photoshop... and then import these. I know it's not ideal but for small printers it's still acceptable I guess!
    – go-junta
    Commented Jun 26, 2015 at 18:15

I had exactly the same problem with a composite image assembled using XeTeX; very late last night I realised that the probably cause of the problem was that the transparent foreground element was RGB while the background was CMYK. I used Adobe Acrobat to convert the PDF to Photoshop 5 CMYK and the faintly visible transparent square artifact completely disappeared on printing. It also had the beneficial side effect of increasing the perceived colour saturation.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.