My client wish was a logo with blur effect (as TATE Modern for example). Now I need to prepare all kind of files to deliver with small CI. The issue is, that logo doesn't scale properly. So the question is: should I change all blured element with "Expand Appearance" or "Rasterize" or leave blur as it is (last - I don't think so)?

thanks for help!

  • 2
    What is "Small Cl"? – DA01 Sep 21 '15 at 19:30

While vector file formats today do support 'live' effects like blur, I don't think I'd rely on them quite yet. As such, yes, you do want to rasterize the effect so you have control.

So keep the illustrator version, for sure, but then rasterize out versions at the sizes you need.

As for the Tate, note that they don't have 'a logo' but rather a logo system. For example, the blur takes on a bunch of various forms:

enter image description here

And in some instances, they use a halftone, which could be turned into a vector fairly easily:

enter image description here

It's a rather clever--and actually complex--identity system.

| improve this answer | |
  • I hit enter to quick ;) I knew about raster /halftone version of Tate logo, but my concern is the blurred one. I know (now :) how to deal with this blurred parts, but i don't know if other users , find it easy to scale. I will do as you say - rasterize blur in large size and exportt files, but i leave non-rasterized also (eps ai) and write warning in a spectification, that changing size must be taken with special attention. I think this is some resonable idea? – syd Sep 22 '15 at 15:36
  • @syd yes, that's reasonable. You're definitely going to need to write some brand guidelines to show people how to use the logo at different sizes. – DA01 Sep 22 '15 at 17:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.