1

Assume that I want to resize a large image (i0) into different smaller images (i1, i2, i3... where i0 > i1 > i2 > i3 ...) and keep the original ratio when doing the resize. I wonder which of the following approach will generate better result -

  1. i0 -> i1 -> i2 -> i3
  2. i0 -> i1, i0 -> i2, i0 -> i3

Any inputs are welcomed! Thanks!

  • #2 will almost always provide better results.. but a lot depends upon what format you are saving to, what application you are using, and what the nature of the original image is. – Scott Oct 26 '15 at 17:50
  • forgot to mention that the image is in JPG format – tom Oct 26 '15 at 17:51
1

For jpg.. there's no question that #2 is the only acceptable method. Jpg is a lossy format. Every save throws away data. Resaving a jpg as a jpg always results in a lower quality image. For this reason you should always return to the original image if you need to resave. Having an original format such as tiff, png24/32, or psd would be better. But at times jpg may be all you have.

Related: Resizing/shrinking .JPG files without losing quality?

  • Very helpful info! Also, I am using gimp2 to do the size and I do have the PNG format of the original image as well, should I do the resize using PNG instead (and then export as jpg later on)? If go with PNG, would the 2) still be better than 1)? – tom Oct 26 '15 at 18:00
  • #2 is almost always better. I'd use the PNG, resize, then save as JPG. – Scott Oct 26 '15 at 18:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.