1

I have a question what that nobody seems to know the answer to.

I have to make small stickers with ingredients lists (100mmx50mm), i know i should use illustrator but all i have is photoshop.

The Printing company told me that they were unable to print my stickers (300ppi) because when they zoomed in 1200% or more, the images got pixelated, and that was why one order of stickers had "hairy" letters.

I was suprised because it seems like a weird issue, so i started to increase the dpi of the images, so they would look better in 1200% zoom (and why would you have to zoom in that much as the sticker is so small itself).

So i made a design for a magazine, afterwards they told me that they did't want the pdf file but jpg file of the design, when i compressed the picture and saved it had a bad quality so i increased the resolution to 500, they called me back and told me that 300 is the maximum for printing.

I have read about this but can't find an answer on how to resolve this issue, okay, magazines are max 300 but what about the stickers? Is 300 ppi max for printing or can files with bigger ppi also be printed (let's say 1000ppi)? I know the question is stupid but this is the situation i'm in. And no, i can't use illustrator.

What I meant by making the stickers, was that i have to create them with photoshop, I am talking about stickers containing the ingredients list behind on product packages, black and white. Very small size and font, but still readable.

2
  • 2
    Having trouble following this. You may want to edit and insert some paragraph breaks, it might help. In general, imagesetters can run 2400dpi or more at times. So yes more than 300 is possible, but it's not common. From what I can gather it sounds like there may be other issues going on. But you'd need to describe how you delivered the "stickers" for production. *How" they were created, etc.
    – Scott
    Feb 18, 2016 at 8:53
  • To be fair, it sounds like you need to employ a different printer. Refusing to accept a PDF is not acceptable and certainly not normal. Also, if an image is 500ppi rather than 300ppi, it shouldn't make any difference.
    – Billy Kerr
    Jun 21, 2019 at 13:36

2 Answers 2

2

This could be a loooooong answer becouse you have a lot of confusion.

I have a question what that nobody seems to know the answer to.

There is no mistery here. The standard resolutions is something most people on the business know. Remember, to find a good answer you need to know what to ask.

I have to make small stickers with ingredients lists (100mmx50mm), i know i should use illustrator but all i have is photoshop.

You can download Scribus for this that is free. I thought the images were huge. But later I figured out what you ment.

The Printing company told me that they were unable to print my stickers (300ppi) because when they zoomed in 1200% or more, the images got pixelated, and that was why one order of stickers had "hairy" letters.

Ok, so you did NOT make them at 300ppi on photoshop? If you make a document 10x5cm at 300 ppi you dont need to upscale anithing at 1200%.

I was suprised because it seems like a weird issue, so i started to increase the dpi of the images, so they would look better in 1200% zoom (and why would you have to zoom in that much as the sticker is so small itself).

It is not a wierd issue. You do not need to "zoom" it, you need to make them at the necesarry resolution from start. That is why you need to make them in vectors, They are scalable, raster is not.

So i made a design for a magazine, afterwards they told me that they did't want the pdf file but jpg file of the design

Stickers or magazine? Ok. You are mentioning previous experiences. Yes, sometimes is safer for magazines to handle a good quality jpg.

when i compressed the picture and saved it had a bad quality so i increased the resolution to 500, they called me back and told me that 300 is the maximum for printing.

If it had bad quality it is not corrected increasing resolution to an unnecesary value.

Bad quality can be maaaaaaaaany factors. Bad original photo, too much compression, bad color space, bad ink amount.

I have read about this but can't find an answer on how to resolve this issue, okay, magazines are max 300 but what about the stickers? Is 300 ppi max for printing or can files with bigger ppi also be printed (let's say 1000ppi)?

Ok here is the real issue.

1) A raster image is normally printed (on comercial offset) at 150 lpi which is a diferent unit, but the file as a standard should be delivered at double that. 300 ppi.

But a vector font is printed at the maximum resolution the printer has set for that project. For 150 lpi the printer is set normally at 2400dpi.

The least you want is 600 or 1200 dpi. Notice. ppi on a raster image, 1200 dpi on a vector shape. Fonts in this case.

Use google translator for this complete explanation http://www.forosdelweb.com/f6/hablemos-resolucion-697586/index2.html but as a summary:

A) A printer uses its dots (dpi) to form a line (lpi), to reproduce the gray values contained on a pixel (ppi).

A font it is not converted into a LPI it is printed directly.

What I meant by making the stickers, was that i have to create them with photoshop,

No, you do not have. Prepare your background on Photoshop with the correct resolution and phisical size. 10x5cm at 300 ppi.

Add small fonts on Scribus that is free. http://www.scribus.net/

Deliver a well prepared pdf which contains raster and vectors.

Note: I think you can actually export fonts as a vector inside Photoshop to a pdf. I am too square for that becouse I necer do that. Probably someone can comment thoose steps.

I am talking about stickers containing the ingredients list behind on product packages, black and white. Very small size and font, but still readable.

If the font is not that small you could make it in photoshop. It is not the best case senario but you could get away with it.

Aditional notes:

It does not matter if it is a sticker or a magazine. The factors that define the resolution of a file are:

  • Substrate. Coated paper or Uncoated paper, Newspaper, Cloth, Vinyl, etc.

  • Printing technique. Sheeted offset, Silk printing, Flexography, Rotary offset, High Ouality book art print, etc.

  • Rasterized cmyk or monochromathic 1bit image. A normal photo could be 300 ppi while a manga type cartoon or a font could be 1200ppi.

3
  • Yes. Like you say: vector is at "600 or 1200." but really, vector (fonts) are printed at the maximum resolution that the printer is capable of. This might mean 4800dpi. It is possible to use Photoshop for the stickers, provided the OP maintains the fonts as vector.
    – Yorik
    Feb 18, 2016 at 15:55
  • Yeap. True, but that would extend further the explanation. Actually that is on the spanish version Im quoting. But not the maximum the printer is capable but the output settings they have for that project. 2400, 3600 or 4800 dpi. But I'll edit that part.
    – Rafael
    Feb 18, 2016 at 16:01
0

I theory, a higher resolution image (eg 1200 dpi) at a lossless compression can give relatively sharp text on print.

However, it is highly uncommon to do this. Usually vector or text is used for anything that needs to be hard-edged, and images are used for photographic elements, backgrounds, etc

The printer usually has software that automatically improves the customers design for better and easier production. And usually it is optimized for typical jobs. Your image would be very atypical.

For example: the printers workflow software might be configured to automatically downsample images to eg. 300 dpi. Furthermore, it might choose to rebuild your black to contain CMY, which looks better on a photograph but will make your text look less sharp.

A human prepress operator could make your hi res image print just fine, but In today’s automated low cost print industry, your best chance is to walk the line and find software that can output you text unpixelated as PDF.

4
  • Its not generally possible to replicate the crispness of vector graphics with rasters as the vector drawing skips a few steps in the process, reacting at the actual resolution of the printer. To do the same with a raster requires very good knowledge of the printer/RIP in question
    – joojaa
    May 27, 2019 at 9:58
  • Raster images will be sharp as vector if they are >= 1200 ppi and 1-bit (bitmap). Ordinary 8-bit CMYK/grayscale images with smooth transitions will always end up having slightly "blurred" edges compared to vector graphics because of dot screening. It doesn't matter how high the resolution is.
    – Wolff
    May 27, 2019 at 15:09
  • joojaa: I believe we are saying the same. May 28, 2019 at 6:15
  • Wolff: good addition about the 1bit bitmap images. As for contone, yes, the edges will be soft due to resampling, but this can be reduced to a minimum, given high res and proper RIP configuration. Hence my “relatively sharp”. And contrary to common believe, screen ruling (lpi) does not impose a limit on this. May 28, 2019 at 6:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.