I have what is apparently called an equirectangular projection of the world. I can use the 3D functionality of Photoshop to use this as a texture for a globe, by creating a sphere mesh; or I can use "CC Sphere" in After Effects etc. This is great.

I now want to attach (flat) objects to the surface of that sphere (imagine some sort of sticker, an image frame, or text. Clearly, I cannot just add them to the original 2d-projection of the earth. They need to fit the projection. This is very effectually visualized here:


I have no idea how to approach this, or what tools to even use. I figure it might be necessary to design this in 3D to begin with, and then export it to a texture. Any ideas?

  • It's unfortunate that I didn't see your question so many years ago, or I would have told you: Blender is the tool to use for this kind of thing, not Photoshop. Blender has supported equirectangular maps since the release of its Cycles render engine (which existed when you asked your question). And because there is a texture painting feature, it is possible to paint (even cloning from an existing texture) an equirec. map of your own and overlay it on the the existing one.
    – Mentalist
    Commented Mar 18, 2022 at 2:26
  • Correction on a detail: Looks like equirec. support was added just after Cycles itself, not at precisely the same time. (Cycles in v2.61, and equirec. mapping in v2.62) But anyhow, it would have been available at the time of your question.
    – Mentalist
    Commented Mar 18, 2022 at 3:10

2 Answers 2


In the Photoshop versions that support 3D, you can paint directly on a 3D surface, independent of the existing texture. Try making a custom brush from one of these flat objects, and "painting" it on. If your objects are simple enough, that might be all you need to do.

An alternative approach (very much depends on the specifics of your application) might be to put your flat object(s) on its/their own layer(s), turn them into 3D objects, orient them correctly, then merge down (CS6 only).

  • Yes, Alan is totally correct. Painting on the object itself (projection painting) will make the painting/cloning look proper based on the camera angle and the surface of the object, as opposed to painting directly on the texture map (which may not have a 1:1 pixel ratio). Commented Aug 22, 2012 at 4:55

The issue with the equirectangular map is the Tissot Indicatrix, which is the way the lines spread out towards the top and bottom of the map (the distortion when wrapping and unwrapping the texture on a shape). See:

  1. Tissot's indicatrix
  2. How does one calculate distortion on Equirectangular Projection?
  3. Equirectangular projection
  4. USGS Publications Warehouse Map Projections
  6. PanoToolsNG
  7. Panorama photo stitcher

I'm still working on trying to create an action or a set of actions that work with distorting maps to projection. I'll post something once I get it working.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.