A celebrity is a brand.

That brand is marketed to generate revenue, by using that brand to endorse products or services.

By providing royalty-free, commercial use, photography you are asking that a celebrity grant the right to use their likeness to promote anything anyone wants. **They don't do that** for very good reasons. Suppose the celebrity has publicly taken a hard stance on animal cruelty. Do you really think they'd want any animal testing facility to be able to buy a stock image of them and use it in their advertising??? Of course not. So, they protect their brand by **not** distributing any royalty-free commercial use images.

Since the brand is a *person*, celebrities customarily want to *know* what is being sold before they agree to their likeness being used. This also often comes with a fee. A fee customarily *much* higher than any royalty-free stock service charges. 

If you wish to use a celebrity likeness to endorse a product or service, you need to research and find the agency managing the celebrity and then contact them to **negotiate an endorsement deal**.

**You won't find "royalty-free commercial use images" of celebrities anywhere.** All commercial use celebrity images would come with **royalties**.